The Council House is behind the wall, to the left of the church. The San Antonio City Hall occupies this space today. |
On the morning of March 19, 1840, sixty-five Comanche, including twelve
chiefs, arrived dressed in their finest ceremonial regalia. The chiefs were accompanied for this festive
occasion by their squaws and children.
The meeting was held in the council house adjacent to the jail where
present-day Market Street and Delarosa meet the Main Plaza in downtown San Antonio. The twelve chiefs sat on the floor, as was
their custom, and the Texans sat in chairs on an elevated platform facing and
looking down on the Indians, a not surprising white man tactic. The
other Comanche, mostly women and children, remained outside, in back of the
building. Two companies of Texas infantry
assembled in front of the building to provide “security.”
The Comanche brought only one white hostage, sixteen-year-old Matilda
Lockhart, and several Mexican children of little interest to the Texans. Miss Lockhart informed the group that she had
seen fifteen captives in the main Indian camp, and she believed the Indians
would bring them in, one at a time, after the ransom for her was paid. From her observations, she thought the
Indians wanted to establish a high value for the hostages before they released
any of them.
When asked about hostages, Chief Muguara, spokesman for the Comanche,
said that he was sure they would all be released, but only after a large ransom
was paid for each. When he finished, he
asked, “How do you like that answer?”
Whether Muguara was being sarcastic or was seriously seeking an opinion,
the Texans did not like that answer.
They were furious. The Comanche
had reneged on their promise to free the captives. Lamar, always expecting treachery from the
Indians, had prepared for such an eventuality.
If the Indians failed to produce the captives, the negotiating team had
been instructed to imprison the chiefs and hold them to trade for the
hostages. The interpreter was instructed
to inform the chiefs that they were under arrest.
Outside, one of the rifle companies moved around the building to watch
the Comanche at the back of the structure. The other group crowded around the open doors
and windows of the council house, to hear the exchanges as they grew more
heated. The glare of the bright sunshine
made it difficult to see into the dark interior of the building.
The translator refused to tell the Indians they were under arrest, knowing
there would be a violent reaction. Lt.
Col. Fisher, head of the Texas council team, ordered him to translate the
message. The nervous interpreter edged
toward the door, delivered the message, and lunged outside as the Comanche
leapt to their feet, slashing with razor-sharp knives at everyone within reach,
and pushing for the door. One of the
officers may have given the order, it may have been pre-arranged, or the
soldiers may have acted spontaneously, but in any case, the riflemen at the
doors and windows fired point blank into the building, hoping to hit Indians.
The braves, squaws and children outside, hearing the commotion, began to
shoot arrows at everyone on the street, while the Texan soldiers began to fire
at the Indians. According to the
soldiers, they aimed for the braves and did not shoot at women and children.
The “battle” lasted only a few minutes.
Lt. Col. McLeod’s official report, issued the next day, accounted for
the sixty-five Indians as follows: Thirty-five dead—thirty adult males,
including all twelve of the chiefs, three women and two children. Twenty-seven women and children and two old
men were captured and held at Mission San Jose. One renegade Mexican who came in with the
Comanche, slipped away in the confusion.
The Texans lost seven dead and
ten wounded. Of the seventeen Texas casualties,
perhaps a few were actually harmed by Indians.
Most were killed or wounded by friendly fire.
The Texans, once again demonstrating their ignorance of the Comanche,
decided to release one of the women hostages, give her a good horse and
provisions, and send her to the Llano Estacado with an ultimatum for the
tribe. The Texans would release the
remaining women and children and two old men when the Comanche brought in the
fifteen hostages Matilda Lockhart had seen.
A two-week truce would be allowed to give the tribes time to deliver the
hostages.
The Comanche were mourning the loss of the twelve chiefs and other
members of their tribe when the squaw delivered the message from the
Texans. Immediately, they began to
torture the remaining captives in some of the cruelest, slowest, and
most painful methods ever devised. Matilda Lockhart’s six-year-old sister was reportedly
roasted alive over an open fire. All the hostages were dead within a short
time. Of the original fifteen, three
hostages had been adopted by Comanche families and were not harmed as they were
considered members of the tribe. The
Comanche made no distinction between native-born and adopted members of the
tribe—all were considered Comanche and treated equally.
Hugh McLeod and Lt. Col. Fisher made their way back to the primitive new
capital at Austin to report to President Lamar.
The citizens of San Antonio worried about Comanche retaliation,
but within a few weeks, things returned to normal.
In most descriptions of this event, Matilda Lockhart, who had spent
eighteen months in captivity, is said to have been horribly disfigured from
abuse by her captors. Her slender young
body was scarred from months of torture with hot coals, rawhide whips, and knives. Beatings with heavy clubs left evidence of
broken bones. Supposedly, her nose was
entirely gone, burned off with hot coals, which left a grotesque hole in
the center of her face. Her appearance
reportedly so enraged the Texans that they could not help but take revenge on
the twelve chiefs.
Matilda is mentioned in Lt. Col. McLeod’s report of the incident,
written the day after the battle. McLeod
acknowledged her obvious intelligence, but said nothing about any sign of
abuse. It was common knowledge that she
had been repeatedly raped, as were all female captives, but no contemporary
report says anything about scars, burns, or other evidence of torture. The newspaper reporters described
everything about the “battle” in great detail, but no mention was made of a sixteen-year-old
girl with a missing nose. Matilda’s sister-in-law, in a letter to her mother, reported on Matilda’s condition, but mentioned no disfigurement.
The first mention of abuse occurred more than fifty years later. In 1890, Mary Maverick wrote that Matilda had
been abused, was terribly scarred, and her nose was badly burned. Texas writers and the press quickly jumped on
the story and expanded it. At the time,
Texas’ image was suffering at the hands of the Victorian press, both on the
East Coast and abroad. A tortured,
abused, and disfigured sixteen-year-old girl may have helped give the Texans an
excuse for their brutal treatment of the Comanche.
Out on the Llano Estacado, Chief Pochanaquarhip, known to the Anglos as
Buffalo Hump, was planning reprisal. The
sacred council laws had been violated.
The hated whites had murdered chiefs under a flag of truce. Pochanaquarhip was arroused. He was not one to go soft when faced with adversity. He quietly planned and gathered
braves, supplies, and horses for his revenge.
The Texans were well advised to worry—Pochanaquarhip in the Penataka
dialect means “ an erection that won’t go down.” Buffalo Hump was destined to become a legend
in his own time.
Stay
tuned…..We're gonna have some fun with this....
No comments:
Post a Comment